H. Kwesi Prempeh, a prominent voice in Ghanaian governance and democracy, has sparked a significant conversation about the ethics of transitioning from private sector roles to government appointments.
The Executive Director of the Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), known for his incisive commentary on Ghana’s political landscape, has indirectly endorsed the idea that professionals should resign from their current jobs before accepting government positions. While Prempeh hasn’t directly stated this in the provided context, his past critiques of the intersection between politics and private interests in Ghana strongly suggest a need for clearer ethical lines.
Prempeh’s concerns come at a time when public scrutiny over the integrity and dedication of government officials is intensifying. He has previously highlighted how state-owned enterprises often suffer from leadership appointed not on merit but as a reward for political sponsorship, leading to inefficiencies and risks like state capture and corruption. His observations on the matter were relayed during discussions on campaign finance reforms, where he emphasized the dangers of money in politics influencing government policy and appointments ().
Moreover, Prempeh has not shied away from critiquing the practices of Ghana’s Members of Parliament (MPs). He has pointed out that many MPs do not act as full-time public servants due to their involvement in private businesses or other lucrative positions, such as serving on corporate boards or practicing law privately. This scenario, according to Prempeh, raises serious concerns about divided loyalties and conflicts of interest within the legislative body ().
His stance aligns with a global recognition of the need for ethical guidelines in the transition from private to public roles. For instance, in the UK, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (ACOBA) advises on post-government employment to ensure transparency and prevent conflicts of interest .
Prempeh’s advocacy can be seen as a call for Ghana to implement similar stringent measures to ensure that those entering government service do so with undivided attention to public duty, free from the potential biases of previous private engagements.